iPad

A Little Perspective On Technology

Credit: Flickr - Eénwielige motorfiets /Nationaal Archief
Credit: Flickr - Eénwielige motorfiets /Nationaal Archief

[/caption] Forty years ago, the most advanced piece of technology in a law office -- or most any office -- was an electric typewriter.  That's a useful anchor when contemplating whether to buy an iPad now or wait for the next generation in -- God forbid -- April 2011.   Patrick Lindsey provides some useful historical perspective:

• in the mid-1970s, the modern telephonic fax machine goes on the market;

• in the late 1970s, Lexis (now LexisNexis) and Westlaw develop the first electronic research databases;

• in 1980, WordPerfect 1.0 is released; the first IBM PC goes on sale the next year;

• in the mid-1980s, a first-generation cellular telephone network is established in the United States;

• in 1990, an international consortium launches the World Wide Web;

• in 1993, Adobe Systems unveils the Portable Document Format (which you probably know as the PDF). By the early 2000s, many federal district courts allow electronic filing and state courts follow suit.

For many lawyers now, of course, our biggest challenge isn't implementing new technology. That's the fun part. Rather it's dealing with the enormous amount of data these technologies have created.

The iPad And "Closed" Workspaces

In case you missed it, Markos Moulitsas (aka "kos") has a wonderful review of the iPad. But its actually more of a "day in the life" of an iPad user, which I think makes it more valuable for anyone thinking about buying one. The part I found most interesting was his discussion of the relative reliability of "open" hardware  (i.e. PCs) versus "closed" (i.e. iPhone or iPad) hardware:

My Mac, while not perfect, is far more solid than my PCs of old. While the software isn't locked down, The hardware homogenization of Apple's lineup means fewer hardware-related crashes. And given how few third-party apps I run, my software-related crashes are kept to a minimum. The day HTML 5 fully kills off Flash will be the day that 95% of my infrequent crashes are eliminated. Currently, I reboot my MacBook Pro about once every 2-3 months . . . .

On a network level, we've also learned to appreciate the benefits of locking things down. We've experienced this both in deploying virtualized workspaces as well as our desktop management system. The key seems to be allowing the right amount of user customization while keeping the overall system highly standardized.

From a lean perspective, standardized tools means less error and lower variability when carrying out standardized work. It also reduces a great deal of waste for IT engineers, avoiding the time consuming process of fixing problems caused by user downloaded applications.

The iPad: For Techies Or Ordinary Users?

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="152" caption="Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press"]iPad[/caption] David Pogue writes an interesting dual-view review of the iPad.

In 10 years of reviewing tech products for The New York Times, I’ve never seen a product as polarizing as Apple’s iPad, which arrives in stores on Saturday.

“This device is laughably absurd,” goes a typical remark on a tech blog’s comments board. “How can they expect anyone to get serious computer work done without a mouse?”

“This truly is a magical revolution,” goes another. “I can’t imagine why anyone will want to go back to using a mouse and keyboard once they’ve experienced Apple’s visionary user interface!”

Those are some pretty confident critiques of the iPad — considering that their authors have never even tried it.

In any case, there’s a pattern to these assessments.

The haters tend to be techies; the fans tend to be regular people.

He goes on to provide a helpful review -- from both perspectives.

At our firm, we're wondering who'll be the first to purchase an iPad. Our money is on the techies, though most of them are content to wait for the next generation. And Pogue makes a compelling case that this technology is geared less toward the traditional early adopters and more toward ordinary users.

Pad to the Future

In case you need a break from brainstorming justifications for buying an iPad, let's look forward.  My engineering colleague passes along a future interface.

10/GUI from C. Miller on Vimeo.

Admittedly very cool. Still, seems like a lot of trouble and only marginally better than Alt-Tab and a mouse or The Dock.  And nothing yet beats a keyboard for converting language based ideas into digitally usable form (i.e. some form of text). This, of course, seems to be the biggest weakness to the iPad interface. And who -- really -- needs more than 10 windows open at a time?  All those open windows reminds me of this classic from The Onion.

I'm thinking the real future is when we do away with screens altogether and start using glasses and "heads up" displays.  And neural interfaces!

D. Mark Jackson

Bookmark and Share